DOI’s OCS comment process limited, House Republicans charge

April 20, 2009
Ranking minority members of two US House committees expressed concern Apr. 7 that the US Department of Interior is limiting public comments as it considers a comprehensive 5-year US Outer Continental Shelf leasing plan.

Ranking minority members of two US House committees expressed concern Apr. 7 that the US Department of Interior is limiting public comments as it considers a comprehensive 5-year US Outer Continental Shelf leasing plan.

“The system currently in place fails to meet a simple standard of inclusion to promote and facilitate an open exchange of public opinion,” said Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) of the Natural Resources Committee and Darrell E. Issa (R-Calif.) of the Oversight and Investigations Committee, in a letter to US Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

Persons wishing to submit comments must either mail or hand-deliver them to DOI headquarters in Washington, or “attempt to navigate the sprawling online database known as Regulations.gov, where users must first successfully input ‘docket IDs,’ ‘legacy numbers,’ and an ‘RIN’ before they have any chance of advancing to the main comment submission page,’” the two House members said.

They called the new policy “an unconstructive change” from the previous system. “The department’s public comment process was especially user-friendly under the Bush administration, enabling Americans to easily submit their comments through a simple e-mail address. The department should immediately reinstate the user-friendly e-mail public comment system,” they said.

A DOI spokesman said on Apr. 8 that the Bush administration made the decision to use the automated Regulations.gov system to receive and process comments on the draft proposed 5-year OCS program. US Minerals Management Service staff members recommended replacing an earlier system, Public Connect, with Regulations.gov because the updated version has automated functions which sort, tally, and post public comments, he said in an e-mail.

Hastings and Issa said they were also troubled to learn that DOI’s webcast of its Apr. 6 OCS public meeting in New Jersey ended at noon, nearly 8 hr before the meeting’s actual conclusion. “Since many Americans took their personal time to participate in this public comment session until 8:00 in the evening, we cannot understand why the department would end the webcast at the time you departed and before the majority of the public finally had their chance to stand up, speak, and be heard,” they told Salazar.

The DOI spokesman said greatly higher costs for a full-day webcast during the current economic downturn led to the decision to put only the first 3 hr online live.

Transcripts of the entire proceedings will be available later online at www.doi.gov/ocs and www.mms.gov, he said.