TransCanada sees no Keystone XL delay from Nebraska court’s ruling

Feb. 24, 2014
TransCanada Corp. does not expect a Nebraska court’s decision to affect the US Department of State’s consideration of the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline project’s cross-border permit application, the Calgary company said.

TransCanada Corp. does not expect a Nebraska court’s decision to affect the US Department of State’s consideration of the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline project’s cross-border permit application, the Calgary company said.

It said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning’s (R) immediate appeal effectively stayed Lancaster County, Neb., District Judge Stephanie F. Stacy’s Feb. 19 decision. She ruled that 2012 legislation giving Gov. Dave Heineman (R) the power to approve a new route for the project was unconstitutional under state law (OGJ Online, Feb. 20, 2014).

“As we said last week, this latest development concerning Keystone XL is a solvable problem and we are undeterred,” a TransCanada spokesman said on Feb. 24.

“We have dealt with many issues related to this project in the past and are confident we can overcome this latest hurdle,” he said, adding, “It is our view the current 90-day national interest determination process that is now under way should not be impacted by the Nebraska lower court ruling since the approved re-route remains valid during appeal.”

Contact Nick Snow at [email protected]

About the Author

Nick Snow

NICK SNOW covered oil and gas in Washington for more than 30 years. He worked in several capacities for The Oil Daily and was founding editor of Petroleum Finance Week before joining OGJ as its Washington correspondent in September 2005 and becoming its full-time Washington editor in October 2007. He retired from OGJ in January 2020.